Alcestiseshtemoa's Blog

The Myth of Overpopulation

alcestiseshtemoa — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:31:27 +0000

We’re not experiencing overpopulation. We are at the pre-stages of an underpopulation that can last a couple of decades, if not centuries, that has started in the Western world and is starting to sweep the entire world (e.g. check the falling birthrates of Latin America and Asia). In modern liberal societies, one controls population through birth (e.g. contraception, abortions). In traditional conservative societies, one controls population through death (e.g. wars). It doesn’t seem like we are experiencing underpopulation because people live longer today than in the past and a lot of people that were born in the 1960′s are still living. This whole overpopulation myth is starting to get me exhausted and is starting to resemble bad science. I heard once that in the 1970′s, via school, government and the media, that the hysteria concerning overpopulation was wild. Sometimes these monsters can’t seem to die.

Masculine men are not Players

alcestiseshtemoa — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:36:34 +0000

I always wondered where this strange perception came from. Masculine men have always been struck as husbands, fathers, leaders, religious patriarchs and the rest. Technically they aren’t cads and don’t generate love but indifference, at best, and hatred, at worst, from modern liberated women. Masculine men can’t be the desirable 20% alpha men because modern women have been taught by most institutions in society to find them undesirable and many women have internalized this conception. Some ask how so if women are supposed to find dominant men naturally attractive? It’s because modern women have been fighting against their inner female nature. It’s part of the general liberal war against reality. I think the blogger from The Collapse: The Blog said it best.

Modernity is the institutionalization of rebellion against the natural order of being.

The 20% alphas modern liberated women chase with such frenzy are men that most patriarchs would find disagreeable or detestable: bad boys, street-thugs, lotharios, metrosexuals, man-boys and so forth. In PUA language it’s the omegas winning. It’s not a run to the top, it’s the race to the bottom.

The Catholic Knight muses on Santa Claus

alcestiseshtemoa — Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:15:43 +0000

http://catholicknight.blogspot.com/2011/12/who-is-santa-clause.html

Merry Christmas

alcestiseshtemoa — Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:09:55 +0000

Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. – Matthew 1:23

Separation of Church and State

alcestiseshtemoa — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:25:01 +0000

I don’t believe in the separation of Church and State because very little exists in a vacuum and by default secularism will rule when religion is driven out of the public square. There is no such thing as a neutral state and unfortunately something must become the dominant mode of society and the community, e.g. contrary to the arguments of academics, politicians and journalists society is still conformist. It’s just conformed to the belief that everyone is different and special in their own way. To the idea of egalitarianism between the sexes. To racial equality. To environmentalism. To the idea that religion is false and poison with skepticism, atheism and science promoted as good and true.

Recently I have been interested how the Eastern Orthodox Church handled such matters.

I didn’t like how the Protestant Church handled it (much worse than the Catholic Church). Their plan played out instead as a slippery slope from moderate Christianity (18th century) to outright hostile unbelief (21st century). One can muse that such a path was inevitable since the Protestant Church severed their ties with institutional authority (e.g. Catholic Church) and was itself in a paradoxal position.

Striking the balance of religious dedication (e.g. theological conservatism) with adequate liberty would be the best option but that’s hard work and in the past societies that adopted such ingredients (e.g. classical liberalism) tipped over with liberty becoming the defining value (e.g. modern liberalism).

Christian Theology

alcestiseshtemoa — Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:58:14 +0000

Where should I start? =)

Check my posts at TraditionalChristianity.

I’ve been unsure about college lately…

alcestiseshtemoa — Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:38:14 +0000

I’ve written a post about my college plan but I may not go with it. I’m unsure. Why?

Possibility of wasting my time doing a college course that I could do at home and by myself. I will be majoring in philosophy, not anything STEM related. I was going to do Nursing but then I gave up because while I like Nursing I lean more towards philosophy and theology.
Wasting my parent’s money and getting into debt.
Decrease in quality of liberal arts degree.
I’m not going to get any younger and I’ll be hunting for a future husband.
I want to get a part-time job right away because I have other plans. I want to focus on philosophy and theology by writing books and creating something. These activities may take years and I want to start early.

Learning Russian

alcestiseshtemoa — Sat, 03 Sep 2011 11:51:41 +0000

My mother is Russian and I will start learning her native tongue this week. I’m quite touched by this event. It means a lot to me. I will be using Rosetta Stone since their technique is how I learned English in combination with Russian grammar books. I learned English through a combination of:

Entertainment in English. Everything in English. No subtitles. I watched cartoons and films, read books and listened to music all in English while growing up.
Back-up classes on essential supplements such as grammar and the rules of the English language. Perhaps 3 hours per week.
Using English in my travels to English-speaking countries and around the world as an international language.

The downsides of Rosetta Stone:

Kind of expensive.
Allows users to download only on one computer.

This week I start the journey. Wish me well!

What if traditional conservatives and far-right wingers used the “John Galt” strategy from Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand to oppose liberalism?

alcestiseshtemoa — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:54:58 +0000

Not that I’m a fan of Ayn Rand or anything but perhaps this is the most brilliant stragegy that the far-right blogopshere could use. Create our own communities, grow in resistance, more numbers and influence while seceding and exiting from liberal society. Go homeschooling. Refuse to buy or fund anything that is a huge supporter of liberalism. Reject films, books and music with liberal messages (of course a person can watch a secular work of art that possesses little messages that blasphemes Christianity and promotes liberalism). And so many other things.

Why not create our own parallel underground society? We’ve already committed thought-crime and hate-speech in the eyes of liberals. It’s no use to negotiate with them. We’re already deep down the rabbit hole.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/019935.html

Traditional conservatives and sex lives

alcestiseshtemoa — Sun, 10 Jul 2011 15:22:12 +0000

http://traditionalchristianity.wordpress.com/2011/07/09/why-traditionalists-have-better-sex

This pretty much sums up the purpose of the post:

Imagine being married to someone that could only get off if you did something totally disgusting.

This is a real issue now, unfortunately. You never know what bizarre habits they have. Most marriages are split between “no or little vanilla sex” and “lots of unnatural or weird stuff”. There are very few couples who have regular vanilla sex, so it’s difficult to find someone compatible.

And… let’s just say… vaginas have gone completely out of style. Too boring. That was my main point of the article, to point out that even feminists are starting to notice that men’s sexual behavior is getting less criminally-violent but more bizarre. It’s getting rarer for a man to be able to “get off” with normal sex, and women are moving in the same direction. Desensitization and sexual dysfunction on a civilizational scale.

It’s frightening. Without normal sex, marriage as a wide-spread institution is completely doomed. Sodomy (which includes both anal and oral sex) was forbidden for a reason: it strongly correlates with civilizational collapse. No society in which men prefer sodomy to normal sex is going to survive. Won’t happen. People say, “Oh we’re just having fun, this is about choice, we’re doing it lovingly, yadda, yadda, yadda.” No, this heralds the End Times.

That reminds me of this survey that was done in Germany a few years back. They gave children real strawberry yogurt and fake (artificial flavoring) strawberry yogurt. The majority of the children thought the real one was the fake one, and that the fake one tasted much better. The substitute is preferred over the real thing.